CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 26 mai 1989

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }  The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),   Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the convention relating to the application lodged on 2 May 1985 by the Ingrid Jordebo Foundation of Christian Schools against Sweden (Application No. 11533/85);   Whereas on 21 January 1988 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the convention;   Whereas in its application the applicant foundation complained inter alia that it had no possibility of having a dispute concerning the question whether a school administered by it should be approved for running the seventh to ninth forms of compulsory school education examined by a tribunal satisfying the requirements of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention;   Whereas the Commission declared the application admissible on 6 March 1987 as regards the above-mentioned complaint and in its report adopted on 8 December 1987 expressed the opinion, by fifteen votes to one, that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention;   Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in accordance with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the convention;   Whereas, during the examination of the case, the Committee of Ministers was informed by the Government of Sweden that, under the terms of the Act of 21 April 1988 on judicial review of certain administrative decisions, administrative decisions relating to the application of legal provisions referred to in Chapter 8, sections 2 and 3, of the Instrument of Government would henceforth, at the request of a private subject party to the proceedings, be reviewed by the Supreme Administrative Court, that the said Court would examine whether a decision was contrary to any legal rule, and that the Act applied inter alia to decisions not to allow a school to provide the final stage of compulsory schooling;   Having examined the proposals made by the Commission concerning just satisfaction for the applicant foundation,   Decides, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention, that there has been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention in this case;   Takes note of the information provided by the Government of Sweden;   Recommends, under Rule 5 of the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers for the application of Article 32 (art. 32) of the convention, that the Government of Sweden pay to the applicant foundation 10 000 Swedish crowns in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 14 000 Swedish crowns in respect of costs;   Decides, therefore, that no further action is called for in this case.