CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 10 novembre 1989
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-49291
- Date
- 10 novembre 1989
- Publication
- 10 novembre 1989
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-3-c;Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),   Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 10 December 1979 by Mr Angelo Biondo against Italy (No. 8821/79);   Whereas on 3 April 1984 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;   Whereas in his application the applicant complained inter alia that he did not have proper legal assistance when the Court of Cassation examined an appeal he had lodged against his conviction of a criminal offence;   Whereas the Commission declared the application admissible on 5 May 1983 as regards the above-mentioned complaint and in its report adopted on 8 December 1983 expressed the opinion, by thirteen votes to one, that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 3.c (art. 6-3-c), of the Convention in this case;   Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in accordance with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the Convention;   Having examined the proposals made by the Commission in accordance with Article 31, paragraph 3 (art. 31-3), of the Convention;   Whereas during the examination of the case the Committee of Ministers was informed by the Government of Italy that under the new Code of Criminal Procedure, which was adopted on 23 September 1988 and entered into force on 24 October 1989:   - the presence of a defence lawyer is henceforth obligatory in hearings before the Court of Cassation;   - an appellant in respect of whom a lawyer has been appointed by the Court of Cassation shall be notified without delay of such an appointment and shall also be notified personally of the date set for the hearing of his appeal thirty days in advance,   Decides, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there has been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 3.c (art. 6-3-c), of the Convention in this case;   Takes note of the information provided by the Government of Italy;   Decides that no further action is called for in this case.    Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-3-c CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 10 novembre 1989
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-49291
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral