CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 16 novembre 1990
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-49299
- Date
- 16 novembre 1990
- Publication
- 16 novembre 1990
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Fees and expenses award - domestic proceedings;Fees and expenses award - Convention proceedings
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),   Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 27 July 1984 by Mrs D. against the Federal Republic of Germany (Application No. 11157/84);   Whereas on 1 September 1989 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;   Whereas in her application the applicant complained inter alia of the excessive length of civil proceedings brought by her against a surgeon;   Whereas the Commission declared the application admissible on 15 December 1988 as regards the above-mentioned complaint and in its report adopted on 12 July 1989 expressed the opinion, by seventeen votes to one, that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;   Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in accordance with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the Convention;   Having examined the proposals made by the Commission concerning just satisfaction for the applicant,   Decides, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention that there has been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention in this case;   Recommends, under Rule 5 of the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers for the application of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention, that the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany pay to the applicant the sum of 9 000 Deutschmarks in respect of non-pecuniary damage and in respect of costs and expenses;   Decides, therefore, that no further action is called for in this case.    Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 16 novembre 1990
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-49299
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral