CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 13 février 1991
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-49307
- Date
- 13 février 1991
- Publication
- 13 février 1991
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 5-4;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Fees and expenses award
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }      The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31)of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 5 May l984 by D. against Belgium (Application No. ll082/84);        Whereas on 26 April l988 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;        Whereas in his application the applicant complained inter alia that it was impossible for him to take proceedings satisfying the requirements of Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4), of the Convention vis-à-vis periods of detention decided upon under Section 25 of the Social Protection in respect of Mental Defectives and Habitual Offenders Act of l July l964;        Whereas the Commission declared the application admissible on 5 December 1985 as regards the above-mentioned complaint and in its report adopted on 4 March l988 expressed unanimously the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4), of the Convention;        Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in accordance with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, during the examination of the case, the Committee of Ministers was informed by the Government of Belgium that an act promulgated on l7 July l990 and published on 9 August l990 amended Articles 25 and 26 of the Social Protection in respect of Mental Defectives and Habitual Offenders Act of l July l964; Article 25 has in particular been modified as follows:   -     According to Article 25 ter of the Act of l7 July l990, a recidivist or habitual offender placed at the Government's disposal and detained by virtue of a reasoned decision of the Minister of Justice can apply against the decision before the chambre du conseil of the court which has decided his placement at the Government's disposal.   The chambre du conseil verifies whether the Minister's decision is lawful and orders the release of the person concerned if it is not.   -     Under Article 25 quater, after one year of deprivation of liberty ordered by the Minister according to Article 25 bis, the recidivist or habitual offender may apply to the Minister of Justice in order to request his release.   This request may be renewed every year.   The decision of the Minister to refuse the request can be appealed against before a court following the procedure provided for in Article 25 ter of the Act;        Having examined the proposals made by the Commission concerning just satisfaction for the applicant,        Decides, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there has been a violation of Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4), of the Convention in this case;        Takes note of the information provided by the Government of Belgium;        Recommends, under Rule 5 of the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers for the application of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention, that the Government of Belgium pay to the applicant the sum of 50 000 Belgian francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and the sum of 80 000 Belgian francs for costs and expenses;        Decides, therefore, that no further action is called for in this case.    Articles de loi cités
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 13 février 1991
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-49307
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral