CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17Satisfaction
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 27 septembre 1991
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-49311
- Date
- 27 septembre 1991
- Publication
- 27 septembre 1991
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1;Renewal of recommendation for just satisfaction
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }      The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 28 February 1985 by Mr Hans-Dieter Van Eesbeeck against Italy (Application No. 11541/85);        Whereas on 12 May 1989 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;        Whereas in his application the applicant complained of the excessive length of a civil procedure;        Whereas the Commission declared the application admissible on 11 November 1987 and in its report adopted on 12 April 1989 expressed, by nine votes against two, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in accordance with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the Convention,        Decides, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there has been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention in this case;        Having examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report concerning just satisfaction for the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 19 April 1991;        Having recommended on 6 June 1991 to the Government of Italy, under Rule 5 of the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers for the application of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention, to pay to the applicant the sum of ten million Italian lire for non-pecuniary damage;        Having regard to its decision of 6 June 1991 setting, according to Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, a time limit of three months to the Government of Italy for paying the sum due to the applicant by way of compensation for non-pecuniary damage;        Finding that the Government of Italy still has not paid the sum it had agreed to pay following the recommendation of the Committee of Ministers,        Decides to strongly urge the Government of Italy to proceed without delay to the payment to the applicant of the sum of ten million Italian lire;        And accordingly decides, if need be, to resume consideration of the present case at each of its forthcoming meetings.    Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Dispositif
- Satisfaction
- Date
- 27 septembre 1991
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-49311