CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 10 novembre 1992
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-49341
- Date
- 10 novembre 1992
- Publication
- 10 novembre 1992
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1;Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the decision of the Committee of Ministers.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }      The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 13 May 1987 by Mr Pierre Mouton against France (Application No. 13118/87);        Whereas on 2 August 1991 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;        Whereas in his application the applicant complained, inter alia, of the excessive length of criminal proceedings instituted against him;        Whereas the Commission declared the application admissible on 8 June 1990 as regards the above-mentioned complaint and in its report adopted on 8 July 1991 expressed unanimously the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 468th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 13 December 1991, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 9 April 1992;        Whereas on 15 May 1992 the Committee of Ministers held, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant within three months the sum of 80 000 French francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 28 600 French francs in respect of costs and expenses;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of France to inform it of the measures taken following its decision of 15 May 1992, having regard to France's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by it;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers satisfied itself that on 28 July 1992 the Government of France ordered the payment to the applicant of the total sum of 108 600 French francs by way of just satisfaction and that the applicant did receive this sum on 2 September 1992,        Declares, having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of France, that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention in this case;        Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case.    Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 10 novembre 1992
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-49341
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral