CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 14 décembre 1993
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-49367
- Date
- 14 décembre 1993
- Publication
- 14 décembre 1993
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1;Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the decision of the Committee of Ministers.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }      The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 9 June 1987 by Ms Siv Öunapuu against Sweden (Application No. 13625/88);        Whereas on 15 October 1992 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;        Whereas in her application the applicant complained, inter alia, of the absence of a right to a court review of a division of building plots affecting a piece of real estate owned by her;        Whereas the Commission declared the application admissible on 14 October 1991 and in its report adopted on 2 September 1992 expressed unanimously the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 487th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 26 January 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 5 July 1993;        Whereas on 21 September 1993 the Committee of Ministers held, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of Sweden was to pay the applicant within three months 10 000 Swedish crowns in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 23 000 Swedish crowns for costs;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of Sweden to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 26 January and 21 September 1993, having regard to Sweden's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by them;        Whereas the Government of Sweden informed the Committee of Ministers that the Act of 21 April 1988 on Judicial Review of Certain Administrative Decisions, already mentioned in, inter alia, Resolution DH (90) 2 concerning the Allan Jacobsson case, would apply to situations comparable to the one at issue in the present case;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers satisfied itself that on 18 November 1993 the Government of Sweden paid the applicant the total sum of 33 000 Swedish crowns in respect of just satisfaction,        Declares, having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of Sweden, that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention in this case;        Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case.  Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 14 décembre 1993
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-49367
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral