CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 2 mars 1995
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-49492
- Date
- 2 mars 1995
- Publication
- 2 mars 1995
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1;Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the decision of the Committee of Ministers.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }      The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 29 May 1989 by MM. Erwin and Robert Schiansky against Austria (Application No. 15062/89);        Whereas on 24 August 1993 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;        Whereas in their application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 1 April 1992 (final decision as to the admissibility), the applicants complained of the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings;        Whereas in its report adopted on 30 June 1993, the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 505th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 6 January 1994, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 8 July 1994;        Whereas, at the 517th meeting of the Deputies held on 20 September 1994, the Committee of Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of Austria was to pay as just satisfaction, within three months, to Mr Erwin Schiansky the sum of 60 000 Austrian schillings and to Mr Robert Schiansky the sum of 50 000 Austrian schillings, namely a total sum of 110 000 Austrian schillings;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of Austria to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 6 January and 20 September 1994, having regard to Austria's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by them;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers satisfied itself that on 18 October 1994 the Government of Austria paid the applicants the total sum of 110 0000 Austrian schillings as just satisfaction,        Declares, having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of Austria, that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention in this case;        Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case.  Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 2 mars 1995
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-49492
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral