CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 11 janvier 1995
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-49524
- Date
- 11 janvier 1995
- Publication
- 11 janvier 1995
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1;Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the decision of the Committee of Ministers.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }      The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 28 March 1990 by a building company SCI de Boumois against France (Application No. 17078/90);        Whereas on 10 May 1993 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;        Whereas in its application, declared admissible by the Commission on 13 February 1992, the applicant company complained of the excessive length of an administrative procedure concerning the annulment of an order of the local authority requiring the applicant company to suspend work which it had commenced after having received a permit from the local authorities;        Whereas in its report adopted on 31 March 1993, the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 499th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies, held on 15 October 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 15 April 1994;        Whereas, at the 514th meeting of the Deputies, held on 9 June 1994, the Committee of Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant company as just satisfaction, within three months, 30 000 French francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of France to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 15 October 1993 and 9 June 1994, having regard to France's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by them;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers satisfied itself that on 14 November 1994 at the latest the Government of France paid the applicant company the total sum of 30 000 French francs as just satisfaction,        Declares, having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of France, that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention in this case;        Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case.  Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 11 janvier 1995
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-49524
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral