CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 28 janvier 1997

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s25C5D969 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; line-height:18pt } .sD8D566C3 { height:0pt; text-align:left; display:block; position:absolute; z-index:-1 } .s18312A14 { margin-top:89.5pt; margin-left:180.75pt; position:absolute } .sC202EACC { clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s55D91DC7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; line-height:12pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5ABC7ADF { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify; line-height:12pt } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block } .s13F94BDE { font-family:Arial; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } FINAL RESOLUTION DH (97) 8 HUMAN RIGHTS APPLICATION No. 25255/94 DELLA VALLE AND GALATI AGAINST ITALY   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 28 January 1997 at the 582nd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article   32 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),   Having regard to Interim Resolution DH (96) 169, adopted in the case of Della Valle and Galati against Italy (Application No. 25255/94) in which the Committee of Ministers decided that there had been a violation of Article   6, paragraph 1, of the Convention and to make public the report of the European Commission of Human Rights;   Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 8 March 1996;   Whereas, at the 567th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies, the Committee of Ministers held, by a decision adopted on 25 June 1996, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the Government of Italy was to pay each of the two applicants as just satisfaction, within three months, 7 000 000 Italian lire in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 500 000 Italian lire in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 15   000   000 Italian lire and that interest should be payable on any non-paid sum at the statutory rate applicable on the date of this decision, it being understood that the interest will accrue from the expiry of the time-limit until full payment is placed at the disposal of the applicants;   Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of Italy to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 15 May 1996 and 25 June 1996, having regard to Italy's obligation under Article   32, paragraph   4, of the Convention to abide by them;   Whereas the Government of Italy recalled that measures had already been taken to prevent the repetition of the violation found in this case, notably through the entry into force on 30 April and 1 May 1995 of two laws restructuring the civil courts and speeding up the proceedings in civil cases (see Resolution DH (95) 82 in the case of Zanghì against Italy);   Whereas the Committee of Ministers has satisfied itself that on 12 September 1996, within the time-limit set, the Government of Italy paid the applicants the total sum of 15 000 000 Italian lire as just satisfaction,   Declares, having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of Italy, that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 of the Convention in this case.