CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 15 décembre 1997

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s1E59FF54 { margin-top:5pt; margin-bottom:10pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s35F1F2CB { margin-top:10pt; margin-bottom:10pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s995BFA6B { margin-top:10pt; margin-bottom:5pt } INTERIM RESOLUTION DH (97) 595 HUMAN RIGHTS APPLICATION No.   21669/93 J. Z. AGAINST FRANCE (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 December 1997 at the 610th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)         The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article   32 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),         Having regard to the report drawn up on 9 April 1997 by the European Commission of Human Rights, in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention, relating to the application lodged on 13 May 1992 by Mr   J.   Z. against France (Application No. 21669/93);         Whereas on 26 May 1997 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article   32, paragraph   1, of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article   48 of the Convention;         Whereas in his application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 6   September 1995, the applicant complained of the interception and the recording of his telephone conversations as well as of the fact that his guilt had not been legally established since his conviction had only been based on phone-tapping;         Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, by thirteen votes to one, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article   8 of the Convention and, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 6 of the Convention;         Whereas, at the 610th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies the Committee of Ministers, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1, of the Convention, and agreed with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, by decision adopted on 15 December 1997, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 8 of the Convention and that there had been no violation of Article 6 of the Convention,         Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case;         Decides to pursue the examination of the present case, in accordance with Article   32 of the Convention with a view to adopting the final resolution.