CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 15 décembre 1997

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s1E59FF54 { margin-top:5pt; margin-bottom:10pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s35F1F2CB { margin-top:10pt; margin-bottom:10pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s995BFA6B { margin-top:10pt; margin-bottom:5pt } INTERIM RESOLUTION DH (97) 635 HUMAN RIGHTS APPLICATION No.   31354/96 L.L., C.S. AND S.M. AGAINST ITALY (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 December 1997 at the 605th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)                 The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article   32 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),         Having regard to the report drawn up on 15 April 1997 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 16 February 1995 by L.L,   C.S. and S.M. against Italy (Application No.   31354/96); Whereas on 4 June 1997 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article   32, paragraph   1, of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article   48 of the Convention;         Whereas in their application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 21   January 1997, the applicants complained of the excessive length of certain proceedings before the ordinary courts;         Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article   6, paragraph   1, of the Convention;         Whereas, at the 610th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies, the Committee of Ministers, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1, of the Convention, and agreed with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, by decision adopted on 15 December 1997, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention,         Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case;         Decides to pursue the examination of the present case in accordance with Article   32 of the Convention with a view to adopting the final resolution.