CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 15 décembre 1997
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-51045
- Date
- 15 décembre 1997
- Publication
- 15 décembre 1997
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s1E59FF54 { margin-top:5pt; margin-bottom:10pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s35F1F2CB { margin-top:10pt; margin-bottom:10pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s995BFA6B { margin-top:10pt; margin-bottom:5pt } INTERIM RESOLUTION DH (97) 637 HUMAN RIGHTS APPLICATION No. 31341/96 LAZZARI AND SCAGNOLI AGAINST ITALY (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 December 1997 at the 610th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)         The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article   32 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),         Having regard to the report drawn up on 28 May 1997 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 22 March 1995 by Mr   Claudio Lazzari, Mr   Alberto   Lazzari and Ms Marcella Scagnoli against Italy (Application No.   31341/96);         Whereas on 27 June 1997 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article   32, paragraph   1, of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article   48 of the Convention;         Whereas in their application, declared admissible by the Commission on 4   March 1997, the applicants complained of the excessive length of certain proceedings before the civil courts;         Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article   6, paragraph   1, of the Convention;         Whereas, at the 610th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies, the Committee of Ministers, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1, of the Convention, and agreed with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, by decision adopted on 15 December 1997, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention,         Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case;         Decides to pursue the examination of the present case in accordance with Article   32 of the Convention with a view to adopting the final resolution.Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 15 décembre 1997
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-51045
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral