CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 15 juillet 1999

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9BD1BAAD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:22pt; text-align:center } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sFCACDBC6 { margin-top:22pt; margin-bottom:10pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s26BAC482 { margin-top:10pt; margin-bottom:10pt; text-align:center } .sE5E00B8B { margin-top:10pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; line-height:150% } .sD622F424 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:32pt; text-align:center } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5BB93D78 { margin-top:32pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:36pt } .s48A8B0C6 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block } .s47E2B0C6 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     Final resolution DH   (99) 463 HUMAN RIGHTS APPLICATION No. 28652/95 SALA PUJOLAR AND OTHERS AGAINST SPAIN (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 July 1999 at the 677th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article   32 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),   Having regard to Interim Resolution DH (98) 18, adopted on 18 February 1998 in the case of Sala Pujolar and others against Spain, in which the Committee of Ministers decided that there had been in this case a violation of Article   6, paragraph   1, of the Convention and to make public the report of the European Commission of Human Rights;   Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicants, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 18 November 1998;   Whereas, at the 659th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the Commission's proposals, held by a decision adopted on 19 February 1999, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay each applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 250   000 pesetas in respect of all kinds of prejudice taken together and 55   500 pesetas in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 2   749   500 pesetas and that interest should be payable on any unpaid sum, calculated on the basis of each full elapsed month of delay at the statutory rate applicable on the date of this decision, it being understood that the interest would accrue from the expiry of the time-limit until full payment was placed at the disposal of the applicants;   Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of the respondent State to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 18 February 1998 and 19 February 1999, having regard to Spain’s obligation under Article   32, paragraph   4, of the Convention to abide by them;   Whereas, during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of the respondent State accordingly indicated that the Commission's report as well as the Committee of Ministers' decisions had been sent out to the authorities directly concerned;   Whereas the Committee of Ministers satisfied itself that on 27 May 1999, within one month of the time-limit set, the Government of the respondent State had paid the applicants the total sum of 2   749   500 pesetas as just satisfaction and that therefore no default interest was due in accordance with the decision of the Committee of Ministers on just satisfaction,   Declares, after having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of Spain, that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 of the Convention in this case.