CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 9 février 1996
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-51168
- Date
- 9 février 1996
- Publication
- 9 février 1996
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1;Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the decision of the Committee of Ministers.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block }   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),     Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 8 April 1991 by Ms Mathilde Elizabeth Lupker, Ms Caroline Christine van der Mandele, Mr Rudolf Paesie, Mr Franciscus Johannes Joseph Maria Schoenmaeckers and Mr Jean Louis Bernard Seveke against the Netherlands (Application No. 18395/91);     Whereas on 20 December 1993 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;     Whereas in their application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 7 December 1992, the applicants complained of the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings directed against them;     Whereas in its report adopted on 13 October 1993 the Commission expressed, by eight votes to three, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;     Whereas, at the 514th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 9 June 1994, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 9 December 1994;     Whereas, at the 524th meeting of the Deputies held on 10 and 11 January 1995, the Committee of Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of the Netherlands was to pay each of the five applicants as just satisfaction, within three months, 4 000 Dutch guilders in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 3 386 Dutch guilders in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 36 930 Dutch guilders;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of the Netherlands to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 9 June 1994 and 11 January 1995, having regard to the Netherlands' obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by them;     Whereas, during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of the Netherlands gave the Committee information about the administrative measures taken in consequence of the Committee's decisions in order to prevent the repetition of the kind of violation here at issue, which information appears in the appendix to Resolutions DH (95) 91 and 92, adopted on 7 June 1995, in the Abdoella and Bunkate cases against the Netherlands;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers satisfied itself that on 16 February 1995, within the time-limit set, the Government of the Netherlands had paid the applicants the total sum of 36 930 Dutch guilders as just satisfaction,     Declares, having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of the Netherlands that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention in this case;     Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case.  Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 9 février 1996
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-51168
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral