CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 9 février 1996
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-51210
- Date
- 9 février 1996
- Publication
- 9 février 1996
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 5-3;Violation of Art. 6-1;Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the decision of the Committee of Ministers.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block }   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),     Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 9 October 1991 by Mr J.I. P. against Germany (Application No. 18999/91);     Whereas on 12 August 1994 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;     Whereas in his application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 12 January 1994, the applicant complained of the excessive length of his detention on remand and of the criminal proceedings brought against him;     Whereas in its report adopted on 5 July 1994 the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 5, paragraph 3 (art. 5-3), of the Convention and that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;     Whereas, at the 522nd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 5 December 1994 the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 5, paragraph 3 (art. 5-3), of the Convention and that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 26 May 1995;     Whereas, at the 542nd meeting of the Deputies held on 7 September 1995, the Committee of Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of Germany was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 15 000 German marks in respect of non-pecuniary damage, 3 000 German marks in respect of costs and expenses incurred in the domestic proceedings and 3 000 German marks in respect of costs and expenses incurred in the Strasbourg proceedings, namely a total sum of 21 000 German marks;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of Germany to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 6 December 1994 and 7 September 1995, having regard to Germany's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by them;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers satisfied itself that on 20 October 1995, within the time-limit set, the Government of Germany paid the applicant the total sum of 21 000 German marks as just satisfaction,     Declares, having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of Germany, that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention in this case;     Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case.  Articles de loi cités
Article 5 CEDHArticle 5-3 CEDHArticle 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 9 février 1996
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-51210
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral