CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 15 mai 1996
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-51260
- Date
- 15 mai 1996
- Publication
- 15 mai 1996
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block }   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),     Having regard to the report drawn up on 31 August 1994 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 3 August 1990 by Mr Rudolf Hannak against Austria (Application No. 17208/90);     Whereas on 20 October 1994 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;     Whereas in his application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 13 October 1993, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain criminal and bankruptcy proceedings;     Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention, in respect of the criminal proceedings, that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention, in respect of the bankruptcy proceedings and that it was unnecessary to determine whether there had been a violation of Article 8 (art. 8) of the Convention;     Whereas, at the 530th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 2 March 1995, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention both in respect of the length of the criminal proceedings and the length of the bankruptcy proceedings;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 8 March 1996;     Whereas, at the 564th meeting of the Deputies held on 30 April 1996, the Committee of Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of Austria should not pay the applicant any sum as just satisfaction as the latter had not submitted such a claim;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of Austria to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 2 March 1995 and 30 April 1996, having regard to Austria's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by them;     Whereas, during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of Austria gave the Committee information about the measures taken in consequence of the Committee's decisions, which information appears in the appendix to this resolution,     Declares, having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of Austria, that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention in this case;     Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case.   Appendix to Resolution DH (96) 248   Information provided by the Government of Austria during the examination of the Hannak case by the Committee of Ministers     The Government of Austria has ensured the distribution of the Commission's report to the relevant authorities in order to prevent the repetition of the violations found in the present case.     Accordingly, the government considers that they have fulfilled their obligations under Article 32 (art. 32) of the European Convention on Human Rights.  Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 15 mai 1996
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-51260
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral