CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 15 mai 1996

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block }    The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),     Having regard to the Interim Resolution DH (95) 442, adopted in the case of Vinciguerra against Italy (Application No. 19722/92) in which the Committee of Ministers decided that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention and to make public the report of the European Commission of Human Rights;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 8 March 1996;     Whereas, at the 564th meeting of the Deputies held on 30 April 1996, the Committee of Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of Italy should not pay the applicant any sum as just satisfaction as the latter had not submitted such a claim;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of Italy to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 15 December 1995 and 15 May 1996, having regard to Italy's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by them;     Whereas the Government of Italy recalled that measures had already been taken to prevent the repetition of the violation found in this case, notably through the entering into force on 24 October 1989 of the new Code of Criminal Proceedure (see, inter alia, Resolution DH (92) 54 in the case of Frau against Italy and Resolution DH (94) 15 in the case of Sanfilippo against Italy),     Declares, having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of Italy, that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention in this case.