CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 25 juin 1996

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block }    The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),     Having regard to the report drawn up on 30 November 1994 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 19 September 1990 by Mr René Loyen and Ms Marie-Louise Loyen against France (Application No. 17724/91);     Whereas on 11 January 1995 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;     Whereas in their application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 11 May 1994, the applicants complained of the excessive length of certain "civil" proceedings before administrative courts;     Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;     Whereas, at the 539th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 7 June 1995, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicants, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 27 October 1995;     Whereas, at the 553rd meeting of the Deputies held on 15 December 1995, the Committee of Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicants as just satisfaction, within three months, 50 000 French francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 18 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 68 000 French francs;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of France to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 7 June 1995 and 15 December 1995, having regard to France's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by them;     Whereas during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers the Government of France recalled that measures already had been taken to prevent the violation such as found in this case, notably through the setting up of administrative courts of appeal, the redefinition of the Conseil d'Etat's competencies, and the increase of personnel and material in order to speed up the administrative proceedings (see Resolution DH (95) 254 in the case of Beaumartin against France);     Whereas the Committee of Ministers satisfied itself that the Government of France paid the applicants the total sum of 68 000 French francs as just satisfaction, payment confirmed by the applicants by letter dated 20 May 1996,     Declares, having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of France, that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention in this case;     Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case.