CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 25 juin 1996
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-51268
- Date
- 25 juin 1996
- Publication
- 25 juin 1996
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1;Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the decision of the Committee of Ministers.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block }   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),     Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 5 January 1989 by Ms Dominique Mathieu against France (Application No. 15483/89);     Whereas on 10 August 1994 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;     Whereas in her application, declared admissible by the Commission on 1 December 1993 (final decision as to the admissibility), the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain civil proceedings;     Whereas in its report adopted on 29 June 1994 the Commission expressed, by twelve votes to one, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;     Whereas, at the 522nd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 6 December 1994, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 7 July 1995;     Whereas, at the 542nd meeting of the Deputies held on 7 September 1995, the Committee of Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 40 000 French francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 8 402 French francs in respect of costs incurred before the Cour de Cassation and the Commission, namely a total sum of 48 402 French francs;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of France to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 6 December 1994 and 7 September 1995, having regard to France's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by them;     Whereas during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers the Government of France provided the Committee with information about the measures taken in consequence of the Committee's decisions, which information appears in the appendix to this resolution;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers satisfied itself that on 27 February 1996 the Government of France paid the applicant the total sum of 48 402 French francs as just satisfaction,     Declares, having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of France, that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention in this case;     Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case.   Appendix to Resolution DH (96) 258   Information provided by the Government of France during the examination of the case of Mathieu by the Committee of Ministers     The report of the Commission has been distributed to the competent courts, according to a practice established by the Government of France in similar cases. The government is of the opinion that this practice will prevent any repetition of violations similar to that found in the present case.  Articles de loi cités
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 25 juin 1996
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-51268
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral