CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 22 mars 1996

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block }    The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),     Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 20 March 1991 by Mr Thierry Landra against France (Application No. 18005/91);     Whereas on 18 February 1994 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;     Whereas in his application, declared admissible by the Commission on 31 March 1993, the applicant complained of the interception and the recording of his telephone conversations by criminal investigation police officers;     Whereas in its report adopted on 11 January 1994, the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 8 (art. 8) of the Convention;     Whereas, at the 514th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 9 June 1994, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 8 (art. 8) of the Convention;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 21 October 1994;     Whereas, at the 522nd meeting of the Deputies held on 5 December 1994, the Committee of Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 7 500 French francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 22 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 29 500 French francs;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of France to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 9 June and 5 December 1994, having regard to France's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by them;     Whereas, the Government of France informed the Committee of Ministers that the law of 10 July 1991 concerning the secrecy of telecommunications, which came into force on 1 October 1991, (see notably Resolution DH (92) 40 in the case of Huvig against France and Resolution DH (92) 41 in the case of Kruslin against France) would also apply to situations comparable to the one at issue in the present case;     Whereas the Committee of Ministers satisfied itself that on 22 May 1995 at the latest, the Government of France paid the applicant the total sum of 29 500 French francs as just satisfaction,     Declares, having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of France, that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention in this case;     Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case.