CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 19 janvier 1972
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-55397
- Date
- 19 janvier 1972
- Publication
- 19 janvier 1972
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInformation given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe has expressed satisfaction with the recent amendments to Belgium's Vagrancy Act, designed to ensure the application of the Council's Human Rights Convention; the Committee was considering the execution of a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights which had ruled that part of the Belgian Vagrancy Act of 1891 was in breach of the Convention.   The Committee of Ministers was acting in accordance with Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention on Human Rights which provides that "the judgment of the Court shall be transmitted to the Committee of Ministers, which shall supervise its execution".   In its judgment of 18 June 1971, in the so-called Belgian "Vagrancy" Cases, the Court held, inter alia, by nine votes to seven, that there had been a breach in this case by Belgium of paragraph 4 of Article 5 (art. 5-4) of the European Convention on Human Rights.   This paragraph provides that anyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court; in this case, the applicants, three Belgian nationals who had been detained under the Vagrancy Act of 1891, had no remedy open to them before a court against the decisions ordering their detention.   The Court decided that they did not enjoy the guarantees set forth in Article 5 (4) (art. 5-4) and reserved their right, should the occasion arise, to apply for just satisfaction on this point.   Article 50 (art. 50) of the Convention empowers the Court, in case of violation, to award in certain circumstances, "just satisfaction" to the injured party; in fact the Court will be called upon in the near future to consider a request for compensation made by the applicants.   The Committee of Ministers was informed by the Permanent Representative of Belgium that a law was enacted in Belgium on 6 August 1971 amending the Vagrancy Act of 27 November 1891 and that this new law, which came into force on 4 September 1971, gave to persons detained for vagrancy a right of appeal to a court of law.   By a transitional provision, this remedy was also made available to persons being detained at the time when the new law entered into force.   The Committee of Ministers took note of the new law and expressed its satisfaction with the legislative measures introduced by the Belgian authorities with a view to ensuring the application of the European Convention on Human Rights in Belgium.    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 19 janvier 1972
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-55397
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral