CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 12 février 1987
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-55441
- Date
- 12 février 1987
- Publication
- 12 février 1987
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulAnalyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Deumeland case, delivered on 29 May 1986 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling that the case had its origin in an application against the Federal Republic of Germany lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights under Article 25 (art. 25) of the convention by a German citizen, Mr Klaus Dieter Deumeland, complaining that the social courts had not given his case a fair hearing within a reasonable time contrary to the requirements of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention;   Recalling that the case had been brought before the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights;   Whereas in its judgment of 29 May 1986 the Court:   - holds by nine votes to eight that Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), was applicable to the circumstances of the present case;   - holds by nine votes to eight that there has been a breach of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), as regards compliance with the requirement of trial within a reasonable time;   - holds unanimously that the foregoing finding in itself constitutes adequate just satisfaction for the purposes of Article 50 (art. 50);   Having regard to the "Rules concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of the convention";   Considering that the Court has stated in its judgment that the finding of a violation in itself constitutes adequate just satisfaction for the purposes of Article 50 (art. 50) and that no further measures are required in this case,   Declares that it has exercised its function under Article 54 (art. 54) of the convention in this case.    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 12 février 1987
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-55441
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral