CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 21 juin 1988
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-55454
- Date
- 21 juin 1988
- Publication
- 21 juin 1988
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInformation given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Johnston and Others, delivered on 18 December 1986 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling that the case originated in an application against Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 16 February 1982 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the convention by Roy H.W. Johnston, an Irish citizen, Janice Williams-Johnston, a British citizen, and Nessa Williams-Johnston, their daughter, an Irish citizen, the applicants complaining of the absence of provision in Ireland for divorce and for recognition of the family life of persons who, after the breakdown of the marriage of one of them, are living together in a stable relationship outside marriage;   Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Commission on 21 May 1985;   Whereas in its judgment of 18 December 1986 the Court held:   -   by sixteen votes to one, that the absence of provision for divorce under Irish law and the resultant inability of the first and second applicants to marry each other did not give rise to a violation of Article 8 (art. 8) or Article 12 (art. 12) of the convention;   -   by sixteen votes to one, that the first and second applicants were not victims of discrimination, contrary to Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 8 (art. 14+8), by reason of the fact that certain foreign divorces may be recognised by the law of Ireland;   -   by sixteen votes to one, that Article 9 (art. 9) was not applicable in the present case;   -   unanimously, that, as regards the other aspects of their own status under Irish law complained of by the first and second applicants, there was no violation of Article 8 (art. 8);   -   unanimously, that the legal situation of the third applicant under Irish law gave rise to a violation of Article 8 (art. 8) as regards all three applicants;   -   by sixteen votes to one, that it was not necessary to examine the third applicant's allegation that she was a victim of discrimination, contrary to Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 8 (art. 14+8), by reason of the disabilities to which she was subject under Irish succession law;   -   unanimously, that Ireland was to pay to the three applicants together, in respect of legal costs and expenses referable to the proceedings before the Commission and the Court, the sum of twelve thousand Irish pounds, together with any value added tax that may be chargeable;   Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of the convention;   Having invited the Government of Ireland to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the convention to abide by the judgment;   Whereas, during the examination of this case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of Ireland gave the Committee information about the measures taken in consequence of the judgment, which information appears in the appendix to this resolution;   Having satisfied itself that the Government of Ireland has paid to the three applicants the sum provided for in the judgment,   Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of Ireland, that it has exercised its functions under Article 54 (art. 54) of the convention in this case.   Appendix to Resolution DH (88) 11   Information provided by the Government of Ireland during the examination of the case of Johnston and Others before the Committee of Ministers   The Status of Children Act 1987, which was enacted on 14 December 1987 and came fully into operation on 14 June 1988, equalises the rights under the law of Ireland of all children, whether born within or outside marriage.   This is achieved, firstly, by setting out the general principle that relationships are to be determined without regard to whether the parents of any person have married each other. Secondly, the Act gives effect to this principle by putting children whose parents have not married each other on the same footing, or as nearly so as possible, as those born within marriage in the areas of guardianship, maintenance and property rights.   In addition, section 74 of the Finance Act 1988 applies the general principle set out in the Status of Children Act 1987 to existing revenue law.   The Government of Ireland has paid to the three applicants the sum of thirteen thousand two hundred and twelve Irish pounds fifty pence (including value added tax) provided for in the Court's judgment of 18 December 1986.    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 21 juin 1988
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-55454
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral