CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 2 mars 1989
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-55466
- Date
- 2 mars 1989
- Publication
- 2 mars 1989
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInformation given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),   Having regard to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Öztürk case, delivered on 21 February 1984 and 23 October 1984 and transmitted the same days to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling that the case originated in an application against the Federal Republic of Germany lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 14 February 1979 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the convention by Mr Abdulbaki Öztürk, a Turkish national, who complained that the Heilbronn District Court had ordered him to pay the costs incurred through recourse to the services of an interpreter at a hearing before that court concerning an alleged regulatory offence, and claimed that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 3.e (art. 6-3-e), of the convention;   Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany on 13 September 1982 and by the Commission on 15 October 1982;   Whereas in its judgment of 21 February 1984 the Court held:   -   by thirteen votes to five, that Article 6, paragraph 3.e (art. 6-3-e), was applicable in the instant case;   -   by twelve votes to six, that there had been a breach of the said article (art. 6-3-e);   -   unanimously, that the question of the application of Article 50 (art. 50) of the convention was not ready for decision;   Whereas in its judgment of 23 October 1984 the Court unanimously rejected the applicant's claim for just satisfaction;   Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of the convention;   Having invited the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 21 February 1984, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the convention to abide by it;   Whereas, during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany gave the Committee information about the measures taken in consequence of the judgment, which information appears in the appendix to this resolution,   Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany, that it has provisionally exercised its functions under Article 54 (art. 54) of the convention in this case;   Decides to resume consideration of this case at its first meeting after 1 September 1991, or earlier if appropriate.   Appendix to Interim Resolution DH (89) 8   Information provided by the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany during the examination of the Öztürk case before the Committee of Ministers   The Federal Ministry of Justice has prepared and discussed with the Länder legal provisions amending the Court Costs Act (No. 1904 in the schedule thereto).   Under these provisions, in criminal proceedings, or in court proceedings under the Regulatory Offences Act, interpretation costs will be charged to an accused or interested party who is not conversant with the German language only if these costs have been imposed on him by the court on the grounds that he incurred them unnecessarily, either through negligence or otherwise.   The Federal Government expects that it will be possible for an amendment of the law to this effect to enter into force by the middle of 1991 at the latest.    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 2 mars 1989
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-55466
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral