CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 31 mai 1985
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-55478
- Date
- 31 mai 1985
- Publication
- 31 mai 1985
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInformation given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the McGoff case, delivered on 26 October 1984 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling that the case had its origin in an application against Sweden lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights under Article 25 (art. 25) of the convention by an Irish national, Mr Anthony McGoff, alleging violation of several provisions of the convention and, in particular, of Article 5, paragraphs 3 and 4 (art. 5-3, art. 5-4);   Recalling that this case had been brought before the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights;   Whereas in its judgment of 26 October 1984, the Court unanimously:   - held that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint as to the alleged existence of "hindrances" contrary to Article 25, paragraph 1 (art. 25-1), in fine;   - held that there had been a breach of Article 5, paragraph 3 (art. 5-3);   - held that there had been no breach of Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4);   - rejecting the remainder of the claim for just satisfaction, held that the Kingdom of Sweden was to pay to the applicant, in respect of his costs and expenses, the sum of two thousand and seventy Irish pounds (punt) and 25 pence (IR£2 070.25);   Having regard to the "Rules concerning the application of Article 54 (54) of the convention";   Having invited the Government of Sweden to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment, having regard to its obligations under Article 53 (art. 53) of the convention to abide by the judgment;   Whereas, during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of Sweden informed the Committee of the measures taken in consequence of the judgment, which information appears at the appendix to this resolution;   Having satisfied itself that the Government of Sweden has paid to the applicant the sum under Article 50 (art. 50) of the convention provided for in the judgment of the Court of 26 October 1984,   Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the government of Sweden, that it has exercised its functions under Article 54 (art. 54) of the convention in this case.   Appendix to Resolution DH (85) 10   Information provided by the Government of Sweden during the examination of the McGoff case by the Committee of Ministers   Following the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, the Government of Sweden has paid to the applicant, in respect of his costs and expenses, the sum of 2 070.25 Irish pounds awarded by the Court under Article 50 (art. 50) of the convention.   The Swedish Commission for revision of certain parts of the Code of Judicial Procedure, established in the spring of 1983, has been informed about the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights and asked to propose and work out the details for such amendments to the Code as required in order to put it beyond any doubt that it is in conformity with Article 5, paragraph 3 (art. 5-3), of the convention. In the meantime, the Government has seen to it that the National Board of the Judiciary and the Chief Prosecutor publish a summary of the judgment so as to enable the judiciary and the prosecutors to avoid creating situations which had been found to constitute a violation of the said article.   The Swedish Commission has held meetings in different parts of Sweden informing the police, the prosecutors and the courts of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights.   The judgment has also been published in professional publications for police, prosecutors and judges.    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 31 mai 1985
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-55478
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral