CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 12 mars 1990
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-55481
- Date
- 12 mars 1990
- Publication
- 12 mars 1990
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInformation given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),   Having regard to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of O. against the United Kingdom delivered on 8 July 1987 and 9 June 1988 and transmitted the same days to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling that the case originated in an application against the United Kingdom lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 15 December 1980 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by an Irish citizen, O., who complained inter alia of the impossibility for him to have the question of his access to five of his children who were in public care determined in proceedings that complied with Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;   Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Commission on 28 January 1986;   Whereas in its judgment of 8 July 1987 the Court:   - held unanimously that Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention was applicable in the present case;   - held unanimously that Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention had been violated;   - held by fifteen votes to two that there had been no violation of Article 8 (art. 8) of the Convention as regards the procedures followed;   - held by fifteen votes to two that it was not necessary to examine under Article 8 (art. 8) of the Convention the complaint concerning an absence of remedies;   - held unanimously that it was not necessary also to examine the case under Article 13 (art. 13) of the Convention;   - held unanimously that the question of application of Article 50 (art. 50) was not ready for decision;   Whereas in its judgment of 9 June 1988 the Court unanimously:   - decided to strike the case out of the list as far as the applicant's claim for costs and expenses was concerned, a friendly settlement having been reached as regards that claim subject to payment by the Government of 9 235,25 pounds;   - held that the United Kingdom was to pay to the applicant the sum of 5 000 pounds for non-pecuniary damage;   - rejected the remainder of the claim for just satisfaction;   Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention;   Having invited the Government of the United Kingdom to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgments, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide by them;   Whereas, during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of the United Kingdom gave the Committee information about the measures taken in consequence of the judgments, which information appears in the appendix to this resolution;   Having satisfied itself that the Government of the United Kingdom has paid to the applicant the sum provided for in the judgment of 9 June 1988,   Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of the United Kingdom, that it has exercised its functions under Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention in this case.   Appendix to Resolution DH (90) 3   Information provided by the Government of the United Kingdom during the examination of the case of O. against the United Kingdom before the Committee of Ministers   It is intended that the Children Act 1989, which received the Royal Assent on 16 November 1989, will come into force as a whole in October 1991.   Section 34 of the Act contains a number of provisions which henceforth confer inter alios on parents the possibility of having all questions of contact with their children placed in local authority care determined by a court in proceedings complying with Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention.    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 12 mars 1990
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-55481
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral