CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 15 mai 1992

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }       The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of the Sunday Times against the United Kingdom (No. 2) delivered on 26 November 1991 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;        Recalling that the case originated in an application against the United Kingdom lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 31 July 1987 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by Times Newspapers Ltd., a company incorporated in England and Mr Andrew Neil, a British national, who complained that interlocutory injunctions restrained them between July 1987 and October 1988 from publishing details of unauthorised memoirs alleging unlawful conduct by the security service and information obtained from their author, a former employee of the service;        Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Commission on 12 October 1990 and by the Government of the United Kingdom on 23 November 1990;        Whereas in its judgment of 26 November 1991 the Court unanimously:   -     held that there had been a violation of Article 10      (art. 10) of the Convention;   -     held that there had been no violation of Article 13 or      of Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 10      (art. 13+10, art. 14+10);   -     held that the United Kingdom was to pay, within three      months, to the applicants jointly the sum of 100 000      pounds sterling, together with any value added tax      that may be chargeable, for costs and expenses;   -     dismissed the remainder of the claim for just      satisfaction;        Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention;        Having invited the Government of the United Kingdom to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 26 November 1991, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide by it;        Having satisfied itself that the Government of the United Kingdom has paid the applicants on 18 December 1991 the sum provided for in the judgment of 26 November 1991,        Declares that it has exercised its functions under Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention in this case.