CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 26 janvier 1993

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }       The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Olsson (No. 2) case delivered on 27 November 1992 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;        Recalling that the case originated in an application against Sweden lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 23 October 1987 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by Mr Stig and Mrs Gun Olsson, Swedish nationals, who complained, inter alia, of the restrictions on access imposed on them concerning their children placed with foster parents and of the absence of a court remedy to challenge the said restrictions;        Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Government of Sweden on 20 August 1991;        Whereas in its judgment of 27 November 1992 the Court:        - held by six votes to three that there had been no violation of Article 8 (art. 8) in respect of the prohibition on removal;        - held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 8 (art. 8) of the Convention on account of the restrictions on access imposed between 23 June 1987 and 1 July 1990;        - held by six votes to three that there had been no violation of Article 8 (art. 8) on account of the restrictions on access imposed after 1 July 1990;        - held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), in that no court remedy had been available to challenge the restrictions on access imposed between 23 June 1987 and 1 July 1990;        - held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), as regards any of the other points raised by the applicants before the Commission and the Court;        - held by seven votes to two that no separate issue arose under Article 53 (art. 53);        - held unanimously that it was not necessary to examine the other complaints, under Article 6, paragraph 1 and 13 (art. 6-1, art. 13), which the applicants had made before the Commission but had not reiterated before the Court;        - held unanimously that Sweden was to pay to the applicants jointly, within three months, 50 000 Swedish crowns for non-pecuniary damage, and, for legal fees and expenses, 55 000 Swedish crowns less 6 900 French francs to be converted into Swedish crowns at the rate applicable on the date of delivery of the present judgment;        - dismissed the remainder of the claim for just satisfaction;        Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention;        Having invited the Government of Sweden to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 27 November 1992, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide by it;        Whereas, during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of Sweden gave the Committee information about the measures taken in consequence of the judgment, which information appears in the appendix to this resolution;        Having satisfied itself that the Government of Sweden has paid the applicants the sums provided for in the judgment,        Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of Sweden, that it has exercised its functions under Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention in this case.                   Appendix to Resolution DH (93)3          Information provided by the Government of Sweden       during the examination of the Olsson case (No. 2)                  by the Committee of Ministers        Sections 31 and 41 of the 1990 Act containing special provisions on the care of young persons, already mentioned in paragraphs 66 and 67 of the Court's judgment and in Resolution DH (91) 14 of 6 June 1991 relating to the Court's judgment of 22 June 1989 in the Eriksson case, will ensure that in future the violations of Articles 6 and 8 (art. 6, art. 8) of the Convention found by the Court in the present case will not occur again.        The sums awarded to the applicants by way of just satisfaction were paid on 23 December 1992.