CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 9 juin 1994

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }       The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of A., delivered on 23 November 1993 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;        Recalling that the case originated in an application against France lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 15 February 1989 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by Mrs A., a French national, who complained of the secret and unlawful recording of one of her telephone conversations;        Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Commission on 26 October 1992;        Whereas in its judgment of 23 November 1993 the Court unanimously:        - dismissed the government's preliminary objections;        - held that there had been a violation of Article 8 (art. 8);        - held that the finding of this violation constituted sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained;        - held that the respondent state was to pay to the applicant, within three months, 50 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses;        - dismissed the remainder of the applicant's claim;        Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention;        Having invited the Government of France to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 23 November 1993, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide by it;        Having satisfied itself that the Government of France has paid the applicant the sum provided for in the judgment of 23 November 1993,        Declares that it has exercised its functions under Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention in this case.