CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 4 mai 1995
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-55645
- Date
- 4 mai 1995
- Publication
- 4 mai 1995
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInformation given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment.
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }      The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Sigurdur A. Sigurjonsson case delivered on 30 June 1993 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;        Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 16130/90) against Iceland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 22 December 1989 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by Mr Sigurdur A. Sigurjonsson, an Icelandic national, and that the Commission declared admissible the complaints regarding the obligation, imposed by law, upon the applicant to be a member of a specific private-law association (trade-union) in order not to lose his taxi-driver's licence;        Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Commission on 10 July 1992;        Whereas in its judgment of 30 June 1993 the Court unanimously:        - held by eight votes to one that there had been a violation of Article 11 (art. 11);        - held unanimously that it was not necessary to examine the case under Articles 9 (art. 9) or 10 (art. 10);        - held unanimously that it was also not necessary to determine whether there had been a violation of Article 13 (art. 13);        Whereas in its judgment of 30 June 1993 the Court unanimously rejected the remainder of the applicant's claim for just satisfaction;        Whereas in its judgment of 30 June 1993 the Court unanimously:        - held that the respondent state was to pay, for legal fees and expenses, 2 134 401 Icelandic crowns, less 14 863 French francs to be converted into Icelandic crowns at the rate applicable on the date of delivery of the judgment;        Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention;        Having invited the Government of Iceland to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 30 June 1993, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide by it;        Whereas, during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of Iceland gave the Committee information about the measures taken in consequence of the judgment, which information appears in the appendix to this resolution;        Having satisfied itself that on 21 July 1993 the Government of Iceland paid the applicant the sum provided for in the judgment in the case of Sigurjonsson of 30 June 1993,        Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of Iceland, that it has exercised its functions under Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention in this case.                   Appendix to Resolution DH (95) 36           Information provided by the Government of Iceland    during the examination of the Sigurdur A. Sigurjonsson case                   by the Committee of Ministers        By Act No. 61/1995, which entered into force on 8 March 1995, the Icelandic Parliament has abolished the requirement that taxi operators in Iceland have to belong to a specified union in order to obtain a license to conduct business.   There is, accordingly, no longer any risk of repetition of the violation of Article 11 (art. 11) of the Convention found by the Court in the present case.        The just satisfaction awarded by the Court was paid on 21 July 1993.  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 4 mai 1995
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-55645
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral