CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 15 décembre 1995
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-55667
- Date
- 15 décembre 1995
- Publication
- 15 décembre 1995
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulAnalyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }      The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Steffano case delivered on 27 February 1992 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;        Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 12409/86) against Italy, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 16 June 1986 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by Ms Silvia Steffano, an Italian national, and that the Commission declared admissible the complaint concerning the excessive length of certain "civil" proceedings before administrative courts and the "Conseil d'Etat";        Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Commission on 8 March 1991;        Whereas in its judgment of 27 February 1992 the Court unanimously:        - held that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        - held that the present judgment constituted in itself sufficient just satisfaction for the purposes of Article 50 (art. 50) in respect of the non-pecuniary damage alleged;        - dismissed the remainder of the applicant's claim;        Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention;        Considering that the Court has stated in its judgment that the finding of a violation in itself constituted adequate just satisfaction for the purposes of Article 50 (art. 50) and that no further measures are required in this case,        Declares that it has exercised its functions under Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention in this case.  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 15 décembre 1995
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-55667
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral