CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 7 juin 1995

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }       The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Pugliese II delivered on 24 May 1991 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;        Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 11671/85) against Italy lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 29 June 1985 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by Mr Vincenzo Pugliese, an Italian national, and that the Commission declared admissible the complaint of the excessive length of certain civil proceedings;        Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Commission on 21 May 1990;        Whereas in its judgment of 24 May 1991 the Court unanimously:        - held that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        - dismissed the claim for just satisfaction;        Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention;        Having invited the Government of Italy to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 24 May 1991, having regard to Italy's obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide by it;        Whereas the Government of Italy recalled that measures had already been taken to prevent the repetition of the violation found in this case, through the entry into force on 30 April and 1 May 1995 of two laws restructuring the civil courts and speeding up the civil proceedings (see Resolution DH (95) 82 in the case of Zanghì against Italy,        Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of Italy, that it has exercised its functions under Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention in this case.