CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 23 juillet 2001

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s776E10E7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5C5E66B9 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .sB20B16E1 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2001)88 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 5 October 2000 (final on 5 January 2001) in the case of Launikari against Finland   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 23 July 2001 at the 760 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Launikari case delivered on 5 October 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 34120/96) against Finland, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 3 December 1996 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Jaakko Launikari, a Finnish national, and that the Court, seized of the case under Article 5, paragraph 2, of Protocol No. 11, declared admissible the complaint concerning the excessive length of certain civil proceedings; Whereas in its judgment of 5 October 2000 the Court unanimously: - held that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention; - held that the Government of the respondent state was to pay the applicant, within three months from the date at which the judgment became final, 20 000 Finnish marks in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 30 622 Finnish marks in respect of costs and expenses, plus any added tax-value that may be chargeable, and that simple interest at an annual rate of 10% would be payable on those sums from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement; - dismissed the remainder of the applicant’s claim for just satisfaction; Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention; Having invited the Government of the respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 5 October 2000, having regard to Finland’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by it; Whereas during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of the respondent state indicated that the Court’s judgment had been sent out to the authorities directly concerned; Having satisfied itself that on 13 November 2000, within the time-limit set, the Government of the respondent state had paid the applicant the sum provided for in the judgment of 5 October 2000, Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of Finland, that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case.