CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 25 avril 2005

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sFCD7D858 { margin-left:1.65pt; border:1.5pt double #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s7C35CBBD { border-right-style:double; border-right-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:1.5pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:top } .s9A734C56 { border-right-style:double; border-right-width:1.5pt; border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:1.5pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBF10AB1 { border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:1.5pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:top } .s1A08084E { border-top-style:double; border-top-width:1.5pt; border-right-style:double; border-right-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:1.5pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:top } .s4CCA2433 { border-style:double; border-width:1.5pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:top } .s2AB3D1C6 { border-top-style:double; border-top-width:1.5pt; border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:1.5pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:top } .s9B8DC3B3 { border-top-style:double; border-top-width:1.5pt; border-right-style:double; border-right-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:1.5pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .sCE97D62E { border-style:double; border-width:1.5pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .sC18575F0 { border-top-style:double; border-top-width:1.5pt; border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:1.5pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .sA6524EF { border-top-style:double; border-top-width:1.5pt; border-right-style:double; border-right-width:1.5pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:top } .s8E7C0AC9 { border-top-style:double; border-top-width:1.5pt; border-right-style:double; border-right-width:1.5pt; border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:top } .sAAECE211 { border-top-style:double; border-top-width:1.5pt; border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:top } Resolution ResDH(2005)35 concerning the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (Friendly settlements) in twenty-one cases against Poland (see Appendix) relating to the length of civil proceedings   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 25 April 2005 at the 922nd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),   Having regard to the final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the twenty-one cases listed in the Appendix to this resolution and transmitted immediately to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that these cases originated in applications (see Appendix) against Poland, lodged with the European Court of Human Rights between 21 November 1998 and 15 February 2002 under Article 34 of the Convention, by twenty-three Polish nationals, and that the Court declared admissible, inter alia , the applicants' complaints related to the length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations;   Whereas in its judgments concerning these cases the Court, after having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided, unanimously, to strike these cases out of its list;   Whereas under the above-mentioned friendly settlements it was agreed that the Polish Government would pay the applicants certain sums (see Appendix), within three months as from the delivery of the judgments;   Recalling that Rule 43, paragraph 3, of the Rules of the Court (former Rule 44, paragraph 2) provides that the striking-out of a case which has been declared admissible shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee of Ministers once it has become final in order to allow it to supervise, in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the execution of any undertakings which may have been attached to the discontinuance, friendly settlement or solution of the matter;   Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that, on the dates indicated in the Appendix, within the time-limits agreed to under the terms of the friendly settlements, the government of the respondent state had paid the applicants the sums provided for in the friendly settlements and that no other measure was required in the present cases to conform to the Court's judgments;   Recalling that, as regards most of the applicants' complaints declared admissible in these cases, the Committee of Ministers is at present supervising the execution of several judgments of the Court (in particular the Podbielski judgment of 30 October 1998) finding in particular violations of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention on account of the excessive length of civil proceedings,   Declares, after having examined the information supplied by the Government of Poland, that the Committee of Ministers has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention with respect to the undertakings subscribed to in these cases.   Appendix to Resolution ResDH(2005)35   List of cases with details of sums agreed to and dates of payment   Case Application No. Date of judgment Total Payment on Chudyba, Teresa 71621/01 23/09/2003 15 000 zlotys 09/12/2003 Cwyl, Józef and Darius 49920/99 09/12/2003 25 000 zlotys 10/02/2004 Dragan, Janusz 58780/00 15/07/2003 16 000 zlotys 12/09/2003 Godlewski, Krzysztof 53551/99 08/07/2003 16 000 zlotys 29/08/2003 Górecka, Janina 73009/01 23/09/2003 13 000 zlotys 11/12/2003 Górka, Janina 55106/00 05/11/2002 10 000 zlotys 30/01/2003 Janowski, Józef Micheł (No. 2) 49033/99 23/09/2003 17 000 zlotys 21/11/2003 Kledzik, Jadwiga 75098/01 23/09/2003 12 500 zlotys 29/10/2003 M.M. and E.M.M. 76158/01 29/07/2003 12 000 zlotys 09/09/2003 Mazurkiewicz, Piotr 72662/01 14/10/2003   6 500 zlotys 13/01/2004 Mikulska, Henryk 8205/02 29/07/2003 15 000 zlotys 08/09/2003 Nowakowski, Stanisław 71009/01 29/07/2003 15 000 zlotys 04/09/2003 Pieniążek, Krzysztof 57465/00 28/10/2003 14 000 zlotys 26/01/2004 Radek, Mirosław 30311/02 20/07/2004 15 000 zlotys 09/09/2004 Sagan, Krystyna 6901/02 24/06/2003 17 500 zlotys 29/08/2003 Sędek, Janina 67165/01 06/05/2003 17 000 zlotys 24/06/2003 Skóra, Henryk 67162/01 01/07/2003 14 000 zlotys 09/09/2003 Skowroński, Mirosław 52595/99 17/02/2004 15 000 zlotys 25/03/2004 Stańczyk, Janina 50511/99 02/12/2003 22 500 zlotys 29/01/2004 Szymański, Marian 75929/01 21/10/2003 13 000 zlotys 08/12/2003 Wysocka-Cysarz, Teresa 61888/00 01/07/2003 12 500 zlotys 21/07/2003