CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 21 juin 2005

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s66053943 { text-transform:uppercase } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s2007D3CB { width:100%; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sD2E4E11A { width:16.3%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFCF13B8 { width:12.12%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3C10655B { width:11.78%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5E1521F7 { width:11.96%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s383E67D8 { width:11.96%; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4DDF9F1B { width:16.3%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB63B730F { width:12.12%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA9793F16 { width:11.78%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s46C2C7A { width:11.96%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s355DB334 { width:11.96%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5735B2D7 { width:16.3%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s1693508 { width:12.12%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2E3C19DF { width:11.78%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sE57BAFA8 { width:11.96%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6AFD3398 { width:11.96%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sAEAEF8F3 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:12pt } .s85646119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:12pt } .sEFA16DF0 { width:11.96%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sA527F4CF { font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s14C34524 { font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super } .sE77803BE { width:11.96%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s23ADBB69 { font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s116BEA21 { font-size:8pt } Resolution ResDH(2005)45 concerning the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights delivered between 30   January   2001 and 15   July   2004 (final between 30   April   2001 and 10   July   2004) in the 8 cases against Turkey (see appendix) concerning the administration's delay in payment of additional compensation for expropriation and the applicable rate of default interest   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 21 June 2005 at the 928th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),   Having regard to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the 8 cases details of which appear in the appendix to this resolution, delivered between 30   January   2001 and 15   July   2004 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the cases originated in applications against Turkey, lodged between 26   August   1991 and 10   May   1999 with the European Commission of Human Rights under former Article 25 of the Convention or with the European Court of Human Rights under Article 34 of the Convention by several Turkish nationals, and that the Court declared admissible the complaints that there had been a breach of the applicant's right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions due to the administration's delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the expropriation of the applicants' properties and due to the loss of value this caused as a result of the substantial difference between the default interest rate applicable at the time and the average rate of inflation in Turkey;   Whereas in its judgments between 30   January   2001 and 15   July   2004 concerning these cases the Court unanimously:   -   held there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention;   -   held that the government of the respondent state was to pay the applicants, within three months from the date at which the judgments became final, the amounts of just satisfaction (set out in the appendix to this resolution) to be converted into Turkish liras at the rate applicable on the date of settlement and that simple interest at an annual rate would be payable on the amounts (rates are set out in the appendix to this resolution) from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement ;   -   dismissed the remainder of the applicants' claim for just satisfaction;   Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article   46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgments delivered between 30   January   2001 and 15   July   2004, having regard to Turkey's obligation under Article   46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by it;   Whereas during the examination of the cases by the Committee of Ministers, the government of the respondent State recalled that measures had already been taken to avoid new violations of the same kind (see Resolutions ResDH(2001)70 and ResDH(2001)71 in the cases Aka and Akkuş against Turkey, respectively), notably through the entry into force on 1 January 2000 of Law No. 4489, which brought the statutory rate of default interest into line with the annual rediscount rate applied by the Turkish Central Bank to short-term debts (the latter rate is fixed and permanently reviewed, taking into account particularly the country's inflation rate), and indicated that the Court's judgments had been sent out to the authorities directly concerned;   Having satisfied itself that on the dates indicated in the appendix, the government of the respondent state had paid the applicants the sums provided for in these judgments,   Declares, after having examined the information supplied by the Government of Turkey, that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases.     Appendix to Resolution ResDH(2005)45   Details of the just satisfaction awarded to the applicants (to be converted into Turkish liras at the rate applicable at the date of the settlement)   Simple interest at an annual rate of 6%. Case Application Date of judgment Date of final judgment Non-pecuniary damage Pecuniary damage Costs Date of payment GÖÇMEN and Others 19279/92 30/01/01 30/04/01 7000 USD 3200 USD 300 USD 15/08/01 + interests Cela ŞEN and Keziban ŞEN 19303/92 10/04/01 10/07/01 2000 USD 6981 USD 300 USD 20/02/02 + interests     Simple interest equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points Case Application Date of judgment Date of final judgment Non-pecuniary damage Pecuniary damage Costs Date of payment AYDIN Asuman 40261/98 15/07/04 10/11/04 - 130611€ - 10/02/05 BARANSEL and Others 41578/98 27/05/04 10/11/04 - 87000 € - 11/02/05 ÖNER and ÇAVUŞOĞLU 42559/98 24/06/04 10/11/04 - 215200€ 500€ 09/02/05 DÖNMEZ 48990/99 29/04/04 29/07/04 - [1] 26800 € - 27/10/04 YAZGAN 49657/99 22/04/04 22/07/04 - 1 6500 € 1500 € 22/10/04 YAZGANOĞLU and others 50915/99 22/04/04 22/07/04 - 1 3000 € 1200 € 22/10/04         [1] The finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage suffered.