CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 27 mars 2008

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s87C74EA6 { font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s7F74B77E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; font-size:12pt } .sF8AEFD1F { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4894483B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sFB5BB313 { width:29.88pt; display:inline-block } .s1DF12FE5 { width:99.84%; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s239D5D7A { height:24.35pt } .s55E1E9C8 { width:28.48%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s6B5A1EA8 { width:14.42%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sE25E937E { width:18.74%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sAAE798A2 { width:15.82%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA0FB61FB { width:22.54%; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sDA7EE0A6 { width:28.48%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s81F327C1 { width:14.42%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s1F4BF37 { width:18.74%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5465CE11 { width:15.82%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s39F5088D { width:22.54%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA678F94A { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right; font-size:11pt } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s12B8AD1E { width:22.54%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6586E30C { font-size:7.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s49A78FE0 { width:26.55pt; display:inline-block } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block } .sB2A0F2B6 { font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sF66F4DA4 { width:23.21pt; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s23ADBB69 { font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2008)29 [1] Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Ayaz and others and 34 other cases against Turkey     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final;   Recalling that the violations of the Convention found by the Court in these cases concern the unlawfulness of detention and lack of an effective remedy in this regard (violation of Articles 5§§1 and 4), the excessive length of detention in police custody (violation of Article 5§3) and the absence of a right to compensation (violation of Article   5§5) (see details in Appendix);   Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken in order to comply with Turkey's obligation under Article   46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgments;   Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee's Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that, within the time-limit set, the respondent state paid the applicants the just satisfaction provided in the judgments (see details in Appendix),   Recalling that a finding of violations by the Court requires, over and above the payment of just satisfaction awarded in the judgments, the adoption by the respondent state, where appropriate, of - individual measures to put an end to the violations and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and   - general measures preventing, similar violations;     DECLARES, having examined the measures taken by the respondent state (see Appendix) that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.       Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2008)29   Information about the measures taken to comply with the judgments in the cases of Ayaz and others and 34 other cases against Turkey     Introductory case summary   These cases concern the unlawful detention of the applicants in police custody (violation of Article   5§1), and/or the applicants' prolonged detention in police custody (violations of Article 5§3) and/or the lack of an effective remedy by which the applicants might have the lawfulness of their continued detention in police custody decided promptly by a court (violations of Article 5§4), the failure of domestic courts to examine the applicant's request for release from detention on remand speedily (violation of Article 5§4), and/or the absence of a right to compensation in this regard (violations of Article 5§5).     I.   Payments of just satisfaction and individual measures   a) Details of just satisfaction   Name and application number Pecuniary damage Non-pecuniary damage Costs and expenses Total in EUROS Ayaz Cevdet and others 11804/02   20   000 3   000 23   000   Paid on 15/02/2006 Kılıçoğlu Haydar 41136/98   3   250 620 3   870   Paid on 18/04/2006 Sarikaya Mehmet Nesih 36115/97 7   500 2   000 9   500   Paid on 22/10/04 Korkmaz Safter and others 35979/97   12   500 1   250 13   750   Paid on 23/08/2006 I.O. 36965/97   3   500 620 4   120   Paid on 19/12/2005 Daş 74411/01   500 1   000 1   500   Paid on 05/05/2006 Şahin Ibrahim 13007/02   5   000 1   000 6   000   Paid on 30/04/07 Davut Aslan 21283/02 No just satisfaction     Çetinkaya Fahriye and Çağlayan 3921/02   2   000 1   500 3   500   Paid on 19/07/2007 Veske Ahmet 11838/02   2   000   2   000   Paid on 03/08/2007   Name and application number Pecuniary damage Non-pecuniary damage Costs and expenses Total in EUROS Özçelik Osman 56497/00   1   500 1   500 3   000   Paid on 03/08/2007 Pütün Ali Sahin 31734/96   3   500 574,96 4   074,96   Paid on 06/06/2006 I.B. 30497/96   4   500 1   500 6   000   Paid on 26/05/2006 H.E. 30498/96   5   000 1   500 6500   Paid on 15/06/2006 Işık Mehmet Hanefi 35064/97 No just satisfaction     Mehmet Ertuğrul Yılmaz and other 41676/98   9   000 870 9   870   Paid on 01/11/2006 D.A. and B.Y. 45736/99   3   000 1   370 4   370   Paid on 31/01/2007 Bulduş Mahmut 64741/01   2   000 1   000 3   000   Paid on 21/06/2006 Sar Hayrettin and others 74347/01   3   000 1   500 4   500   Paid on 31/05/2007 Ataoğlu Maaruf 77111/01   2   000 500 2   500   Paid on 18/04/2006 Ahmet Mete 77649/01   1   000 1   500 2   500   Paid on 19/10/2006 Okay Mursel 6283/02   2   500 1   800 4   300   Paid on 21/06/2007 Çoban Kuçuk Hasan 48069/99   1   500 870 2   370   Paid on 21/07/2006 Süleyman Erdem 49574/99   3   000 1   250 4   250   Paid on 07/03/2007 Bazancır Yasar 56002/00 No just satisfaction     Çağırıcı Omer 74325/01   1   500 1   000 2   500   Paid on 22/12/2006 Tunç Fatma 16608/02   2   500 1   500 4   000   Paid on 18/04/2006   Name and application number Pecuniary damage Non-pecuniary damage Costs and expenses Total in EUROS Sevk Murat 4528/02   3   900 1   500 5   400   Paid on 10/10/2006 Berk Ferhat 77366/01   1   500 1   000 2   500   Paid on 24/01/2007 Mehmet Mubarek Küçük 7035/02   1   500 500 2   000   Paid on 18/04/2006 Bora Huseyin and others 39081/97   14   000 1   370 15   370   Paid without delay [2] Çelik Feridun and Yıldız 51479/99   5   000 500 5   500   Paid on 10/05/2006 Tanrıkulu Sinan 29918/96 17   000 8   400 25   400   Paid on 04/04/2006 Avcı Zeynep 37021/97   10   000 2   162 12   162   Paid on 13/07/2007 Rüzgar Zeki 59246/00   2   000 1   000 3   000   Paid on 01/11/2006   b) Individual measures   No individual measure is necessary as the applicants are no longer detained in police custody.     II.   General measures     1) Failure to bring the applicants promptly before a judge after his arrest (Article 5§3): legislative reform began in 2001, see case of Sakık and others against Turkey (Final Resolution ResDH(2002)110). Article 91 of the Turkish Code of Criminal Procedure, in force since 01/06/2005, now provides a right to detainees to see a judge within 24 hours in ordinary cases and 3 days in exceptional cases, the decision to extend to be taken by the prosecutor and open to an appeal to the court.     2) Unlawfulness of continued detention in police custody and lack of an effective remedy by which to have the lawfulness of continued detention decided promptly by a court (Articles   5§§1 and 4) : Article 91 of the Turkish Code of Criminal Procedure of 1/06/2005 provides a sufficient remedy, which increases the safeguards previously existing in Turkish law (see Final Resolution in the case of Sakık).     3) Failure to examine the lawfulness of the applicant's detention on remand rapidly (Article   5§4) : Article 105 of the new Code of Criminal Procedure provides that requests for release from detention on remand shall be decided within three days after the request. This decision is subject to appeal.     III.   Conclusions of the respondent state   The government considers that the measures taken will prevent new, similar violations and that Turkey has thus complied with its obligations under Article   46, paragraph 1, of the Convention. [1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 27 March 2008 at the 1020th meeting of the Ministers’   Deputies [2] Payment deadline on 10/07/2006.