CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 21 novembre 1995

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s9FF10068 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s6863D229 { width:26pt; display:inline-block } .s90A93616 { width:27.66pt; display:inline-block } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. November 1995 Acquaviva v. France - 19248/91 Judgment 21.11.1995 Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Reasonable time Length of a criminal investigation following a civil party complaint: no violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and Decisions). Its formatting and structure may therefore differ from the Case-Law Information Note summaries.] A.   APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 Applicability: principal submission before the Court, not raised before the Commission - issue going to merits to be examined independently of the previous attitude of respondent State. Criminal complaint with civil party application: temporarily denied applicants access to civil courts, but a means of securing a conviction, which was a prior condition for obtaining compensation.   Finding of self-defence deprived them of any right to sue for compensation - outcome of proceedings directly decisive for establishing their right to compensation. Conclusion : Article 6 § 1 applicable (eight votes to one). B.   COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 6 § 1 1.   Period to be taken into consideration Starting-point: lodging of civil party application with the investigating judge. End: delivery of Court of Cassation's judgment. Total: investigation lasted four years and four months. 2.   Reasonableness of the length of the proceedings Complexity of the case: linked to political climate reigning in Corsica at the material time. Applicants' conduct: contributed to prolonging proceedings. Conduct of judicial authorities: account taken of the political context and interests of the defence and proper administration of justice. Investigation proceedings taken as a whole did not exceed a reasonable time. Conclusion : no violation (unanimously).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes