CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 3 juillet 1995
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-10200
- Date
- 3 juillet 1995
- Publication
- 3 juillet 1995
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officiellePecuniary damage - financial award;Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings;Interest on amount awarded
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s6863D229 { width:26pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. June-July 1995 Hentrich v. France (just satisfaction) - 13616/88 Judgment 3.7.1995 Article 41 Costs and expenses Pecuniary damage Claim for just satisfaction submitted by an applicant whom, in an earlier judgment, the Court had held to be the victim of violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 6 § 1 of the Convention [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and Decisions). Its formatting and structure may therefore differ from the Case-Law Information Note summaries.] ARTICLE 50 OF THE CONVENTION A.   PECUNIARY DAMAGE Failing return of land in question, calculation of pecuniary damage had to be based on current market value of land — applicant's right to compensation not disputed — award of aggregate sum assessed on an equitable basis in respect of loss of the property and of the enjoyment of it. Conclusion : respondent State to pay applicant a specified sum in respect of pecuniary damage (eight votes to one). B.   COSTS AND EXPENSES Costs relating to the Article 50 proceedings: claim allowed in full. Interest on still unpaid sum awarded in principal judgment: claim allowed in part. Conclusion : respondent State to pay applicant specified sums in respect of costs and expenses (unanimously).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 3 juillet 1995
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-10200
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel