CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 3 décembre 1991

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s9FF10068 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. November-December 1991 Gori v. Italy - 13338/87 Judgment 3.12.1991 Article 37 Article 37-1 Striking out applications Article 37-1-a Absence of intention to pursue petition Length of civil proceedings: struck out [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and Decisions). Its formatting and structure may therefore differ from the Case-Law Information Note summaries. It also covers the following judgments of 3   December 1991 against Italy: Gilberti (12665/87), Nonnis (12785/87), Trotto (12828/8712828/87), Cattivera (12956/87), Seri (13009/87), Casadio (12698/87), Testa (12786/87), Covitti (12921/87), Zonetti (13050/87), Simonetti (13103/87) and Dal Sasso (13337/87).] ARTICLE 37 § 1 : Striking out applications + § 1 (a) : Absence of intention to pursue petition Length of civil proceedings: struck out Lack of interest manifested by applicants in the proceedings pending before the Court: implied withdrawal constituting “fact of a kind to provide a solution of the matter”. No reason of ordre public (public policy) for continuing the proceedings. Conclusion : cases ordered to be struck out of the list, subject to the possibility of their being restored thereto in the event of a new situation justifying such a course (unanimously).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes