CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 26 août 1994

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s85F2E5C5 { width:30.44pt; display:inline-block } .s6863D229 { width:26pt; display:inline-block } .s5B9812EB { width:22.1pt; display:inline-block } .sBDAE81C4 { width:27.67pt; display:inline-block } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law August 1994 Karakaya v. France - 22800/93 Judgment 26.8.1994 Article 6 Article 6-1 Reasonable time Length of compensation proceedings brought by haemophiliac infected with AIDS virus following blood transfusions: violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and Decisions). Its formatting and structure may therefore differ from the Case-Law Information Note summaries.] I.   ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION A.   Applicability Not disputed. B.   Compliance 1.     Period to be taken into consideration Starting-point: preliminary claim for compensation filed with Minister for Solidarity, Health and Social Protection. End: service of judgment of Paris Administrative Court. Total: four years and three months. 2.     Relevant criteria Reasonableness of length of proceedings — to be assessed in light of circumstances of case and having regard to the criteria laid down in Court's case-law.   Complexity of the case: case of some complexity, but the information necessary for resolving issue of State's liability had been available for a long time.   Applicant's conduct: in any case a period of more than three years and five months had elapsed between the filing of the applicant's pleadings and the end of the proceedings. Conduct of the national authorities: (i) administrative authorities: establishment of special compensation fund had not had effect of speeding up proceedings — slowness of Minister in submitting his reply and statement in defence; (ii)   administrative courts: crucial importance of what was at stake for applicant in the proceedings, in view of the incurable disease from which he was suffering and his limited life expectancy; situation had called for exceptional expedition, notwithstanding number of cases pending — more than four years to obtain judgment in first‑instance proceedings far exceeds reasonable time in such a case — reasonable time already exceeded even before applicant was paid compensation by fund — thereafter, what was at stake in the proceedings, in both pecuniary and non-pecuniary terms, had continued to be of great importance. Conclusion : violation (unanimously). II.   ARTICLE 50 OF THE CONVENTION A.   Non-pecuniary damage : claim allowed in part. B.   Costs and expenses : reimbursement in full. Conclusion : respondent State to pay specified sums (unanimously).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes