CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 26 avril 2007
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-11199
- Date
- 26 avril 2007
- Publication
- 26 avril 2007
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1;No violation of Art. 6-3-c;Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Costs and expenses partial award - domestic and Convention proceedings
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 100 August-September 2007 Salduz v. Turkey (referral) - 36391/02 Judgment 26.4.2007 [Section II] Article 6 Article 6-3-c Defence through legal assistance Lack of legal assistance during police custody: case referred to the Grand Chamber The applicant was convicted for aiding and abetting the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (“PKK”, an illegal organisation) and sentenced to imprisonment. Before the Court he complained about the unfairness of the proceedings against him as the submissions of the principal prosecutor at the Court of Cassation had not been communicated to him and as he had been denied the assistance of a lawyer during his police custody. In its Chamber judgment the Court held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 on account of the non-communication of the prosecutor’s submissions. It further held, by five votes to two, that there had been no violation of Article 6 §   3   (c) on account of the lack of legal assistance during police custody. The case was accepted for referral to the Grand Chamber at the applicant’s request.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 26 avril 2007
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-11199
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel