CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 10 décembre 2009
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-1192
- Date
- 10 décembre 2009
- Publication
- 10 décembre 2009
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1;Remainder inadmissible;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s9FF10068 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s5CB9E8AB { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 125 December 2009 Koottummel v. Austria - 49616/06 Judgment 10.12.2009 [Section I] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Public hearing Oral hearing Lack of an oral hearing before a tribunal sitting at first and last instance: violation   Facts – The applicant requested a work permit for a foreign national she wished to employ in her restaurant, but her request was refused by an administrative authority. She appealed to the administrative court and requested an oral hearing. The administrative court dismissed her complaint and held that an oral hearing would not have been likely to help clarify her case. Law – Article 6 § 1: The administrative court which decided the applicant’s appeal was the first and only tribunal to deal with her case. She had therefore been entitled, as a matter of principle, to a public oral hearing. The Court could not find that the subject matter of the impugned proceedings was of such a nature, namely highly technical or purely legal, as to dispense with the obligation to hold a hearing. Conclusion : violation (unanimously). Article 41: Claim in respect of pecuniary damage dismissed.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 10 décembre 2009
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-1192
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel