CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 4 septembre 2018

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 221 August-September 2018 K.M. v. North Macedonia (communicated case) - 59144/16   Article 8 Positive obligations Authorities’ failure to prosecute perpetrator of   indecent sexual acts against minor: communicated The applicant, who was 14   years old at the time, reported to the police an alleged incident of indecent behaviour and use of inappropriate language by Gj.K. who had visited her home as a handyman. The prosecutor established that Gj.K. had touched the applicant’s breast and caressed her leg. However, he concluded that, in the absence of an actual use of force or threat, those acts could not be qualified as rape or any other offence which was subject to ex officio prosecution, but rather as an act of insult, which was subject to private prosecution. The applicant’s subsequent civil action against Gj.K. for insult, which at that point could no longer have been subject to criminal prosecution on account of legislative amendments, was dismissed by two levels of civil courts on the ground that the impugned actions had not amounted to an insult. Communicated under article 8 of the Convention. (See also Söderman v. Sweden [GC], 5786/08, 12 November 2013, Information Note 168 ; and A, B and C v.   Latvia , 30808/11 , 31   March 2016)   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes