CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 20 septembre 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-12128
- Date
- 20 septembre 2018
- Publication
- 20 septembre 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 222 October 2018 Liepiņš v. Latvia (communicated case) - 24827/16   Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Stand for election Member of Parliament prohibited from participating in Parliament’s work during his criminal trial: communicated In October 2014 the applicant was elected to Parliament while a criminal case was pending against him. In February 2015 the Parliament gave its consent for the applicant’s trial to continue and, in accordance with the Rules of Parliamentary Procedure, he lost the right to participate in the sittings of the Parliament, meetings of its committees and other formations to which he had been elected or appointed by the Parliament. Furthermore, his salary was reduced by half and he lost the right to receive expenses. The applicant unsuccessfully challenged the constitutionality of the relevant provision of the Rules of Parliamentary Procedure before the Constitutional Court. The restrictions were in force until the applicant was convicted in August 2016, losing his status as a Member of Parliament. Communicated under Article 3 of Protocol No.   1.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 20 septembre 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-12128
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel