CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 7 septembre 2015

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 235 December 2019 Vavřička v. the Czech Republic (relinquishment) - 47621/13, 3867/14, 73094/14 et al.   Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 Respect for parents' philosophical convictions Compulsory vaccinations of children and consequences of non-vaccination: relinquishment in favour of the Grand Chamber Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Compulsory vaccinations of children and consequences of non-vaccination: relinquishment in favour of the Grand Chamber Article 9 Article 9-1 Freedom of conscience Compulsory vaccinations of children and consequences of non-vaccination: relinquishment in favour of the Grand Chamber The six applications concern compulsory vaccinations for children. The first application was lodged by a parent on his own behalf, complaining about the fact that he had been fined for failing to have his children duly vaccinated. The other applications were lodged by parents on behalf of their underage children after they had been refused permission to enrol them in schools or nurseries for failure to comply with the rules on compulsory vaccinations. Relying on various articles of the Convention, the applicants also refer to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Oviedo Convention), considering that compulsory vaccination amounts to a medical intervention for which consent has not been given. They further complain that the decision on which specific illnesses are subject to compulsory vaccination has been left to a mere ministerial decree. In September 2015 the respondent Government were given notice of these applications under Articles   8 and 9 of the Convention and Article   2 of Protocol No. 1. On 17 December 2019 the Chamber to which the case had been allocated relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes