CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 5 février 2020

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 237 February 2020 Oleynik v. Russia (communicated case) - 4086/18   Article 14 Discrimination Homosexual denied employment by private company: communicated After a job interview, Ms P, a person in charge of an educational project in a private foundation, confirmed that the foundation was willing to hire the applicant as a training manager. Then they continued to correspond via a social network. Ms   P asked the applicant if he was gay, and specified that the foundation “adheres to traditional views” and that it would not hire a homosexual person. As the applicant confirmed that he was gay, she put an end to the conversation. The applicant received an e-mail from Ms   P confirming that he could not be employed by the foundation. No explicit reasons were given for the refusal to employ the applicant. The applicant brought a civil claim against the foundation, claiming that he had been denied employment on discriminatory grounds. He provided to the court copies, certified by a public notary, of his conversations with Ms   P, together with a screenshot of the foundation’s home webpage, where Ms   P was listed as a person in charge of an educational project. The foundation submitted, without providing any evidence, that Ms   P had never worked for it. The domestic courts concluded that no infringement of the applicant’s rights could be established. The applicant complains that his denial of employment was of a discriminatory nature and that the domestic courts did not answer his arguments in this respect. Communicated under Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8 and under Article 6 of the Convention.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes