CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 25 février 2021
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-13182
- Date
- 25 février 2021
- Publication
- 25 février 2021
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleAffaire communiquée;Affaire communiquée
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 249 March 2021 Association of orthodox ecclesiastical obedience v. Greece (communicated case) - 52104/20   Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Inadmissibility of an application for judicial review of a temporary restriction linked to COVID-19, on the grounds that the decision was no longer in force when the application was examined: communicated Article 9 Article 9-1 Manifest religion or belief Prohibition on collective worship in the context of COVID-19: communicated In the context of the COVID-19 health crisis the authorities decided to prohibit collective worship from 16 March to 16 May 2020, a period which included Easter. On 30 March 2020 the applicant association lodged an application for judicial review of the measures in question (accompanied by a request for interim measures and a request for a stay of execution). On 23 June 2020 the Supreme Administrative Court held that it was unnecessary to rule on the application for judicial review, on the grounds that the applicant association, among others, no longer had a legitimate interest in the matter since the joint ministerial decisions at issue had ceased to be applicable. Communicated under Article 6 §   1 (access to a court) and Article   9 (freedom of religion) of the Convention.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 25 février 2021
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-13182
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel