CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 12 janvier 1999

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s9FF10068 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s5CB9E8AB { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 2 January 1999 Maaouia v. France (dec.) (partial) - 39652/98 Decision 12.1.1999 Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Civil rights and obligations Proceedings relating to regularisation of the position of a foreigner: inadmissible   The applicant, a Tunisian national, arrived in France in 1980 at the age of 22.   Since 1983 he has been living with a French citizen whom he married in 1992.   In 1998 he was sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment for assault.   In 1991 a deportation order was issued against him.   This order was later annulled.   As he refused to leave the country, he was sentenced to 1 year’s imprisonment and forbidden to reside on French territory for 10 years.   The applicant secured the lifting of this measure.   He then requested the regularisation of his position and a residence permit.   His request was turned down and the case is still pending before the appeal court.   In July 1998 the applicant was given a one-year residence permit.   He complains of the length of the proceedings and of an infringement of his right to respect for his private and family life. Inadmissible under Article 8: As the applicant holds a temporary residence permit, he can no longer claim to be a victim (manifestly ill-founded). Communicated under Article 6 § 1.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes