CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 4 novembre 2008
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-2297
- Date
- 4 novembre 2008
- Publication
- 4 novembre 2008
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s9FF10068 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s5CB9E8AB { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 104 January 2008 Manka v. Germany - 23210/04 Decision 4.11.2008 [Section V] Article 6 Article 6-2 Presumption of innocence Collection of personal identification data for police records following the discontinuance of criminal investigation: communicated   In September 2003 the authorities discontinued a criminal investigation against the applicant (for burglary) for lack of evidence. Nonetheless, in October 2003 the police ordered the collection of personal identification data on the applicant (photographs, fingerprints and measurements) for their records. Since there was still some evidence that the applicant had aided and abetted the burglary, the authorities justified the collection of the data as being relevant to future investigations and necessary in order to prevent crime. The applicant objected to the order and subsequently brought a court action to have it quashed. His action was dismissed by the competent courts, which stated that it was lawful to collect personal identification data in respect of a person who had not been convicted, but against whom suspicion of the offence in question still remained. Communicated under Article   6   §   2 and Article   8 of the Convention.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 4 novembre 2008
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-2297
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel